Wash. Chief: Fire Service Future Lies in EMS

Posted: Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Updated: January 21st, 2010 04:48 PM EDT
Enlarge Article Text Reduce Article Text Print Article Email this Article to a Friend

Wash. Chief: Fire Service Future Lies in EMS






Open Airways
Open Airways: Stories from the back of the ambulance
EMS responders share some of the most meaningful cases of their careers, sometimes with humor and always with compassion. We hope that they will help us improve your practice and inspire a new generation of caregivers.


More on EMSResponder.com
An inside look into the upcoming issue of EMS Magazine and interview with featured writer.

Discuss today's top stories, the latest trends and techniques and more, including ALS & BLS topics.

From clinical care to EMS Life, the top emergency medical service education & feature content.

By HEATHER CASPI
EMSResponder.com News

DALLAS, Texas -- Fire departments that only respond to fires will cease to exist within a few generations, suggested I. David Daniels, IAFC official and fire chief of Renton, Wash., during a weekend presentation at Fire-Rescue International.

If departments expect to maintain relevance over time, they're going to have to follow growth industries, he said.

"We advertise at the bottom of the pyramid -- we haven't been fire departments for at least the last 30 years," he said. "EMS -- that is my number one business. It's a growth industry. My other growth industry is emergency management," he said.

By offering a suite of services and promoting that to the community, departments will meet the broader needs of a larger proportion of the community.

"I would argue the traditional, only-going-to-fires fire department will not exist in my grandchildren's lifetime," he said.

"We think we're a really popular group and everyone loves us. Well, maybe. But do you want to be loved or be necessary? ...Emotions shift," he said. Communities could question whether occasional fire suppression is worth the price of maintaining a service.

Daniels spoke about the fire service's rise and fall in popularity depending on public perception and major events, particularly 9/11. With major events being rare, affection can wane.

"It's like Janet Jackson said," he quipped. "'What have you done for me lately?'"

Daniels reminded the audience of the times when General Motors had 40 percent of U.S. auto sales, and Woolworth's was the largest retailer in the world. "My how things change when you don't pay attention," he said.

So what do your "customers" really think, and how do you know? Daniels advised polling communities, and considering the difference between the general response and that from residents who have actually used the department's services.

Departments should consider everything about their public perception, including what happens when someone calls the organization's regular line for a non-emergency inquiry.

Daniels also asked responders to realize that they often expect more emergency service funding in the communities where they work than they would be willing to support in taxes in their own communities.

"Ask yourself how you would like to be engaged if you put yourself in your residents' shoes," he said.

Related:


E-mail This Story Print This Story



Share your thoughts, advice, opinions, and expertise @ EMSResponder.com

     
Comments

Posted by colomedic
(09/02/09 - 12:23 PM)
That is a great idea. Poll the citizens and ask them, "now that we have created laws that help with fire protection and awareness, do we need as many paid firefighters?" Nice if the citizen only knew chief, how much is spent on tempurpedic beds, bigscreen tvs, and 3 subzero refrigerators for each station. I know of stations that are fully paid averaging one call a day. That one call was probably a fire alarm. Could be a paid officer with volunteers that may make a little money here and there. but 60,000 a year to run one call a day. lets save taxpayers money and educate them not just wait for the next fire.



Posted by anne in Carmel, NY
(09/02/09 - 04:26 PM)
EMS in the Fire Department
Everyone benefits from EMS except the EMS providers. Nationwide the lowest compensated group in public safety sector and most vulnerable.



Posted by Midwest fire chief
(09/04/09 - 09:53 AM)
colomedic,

I agree with you, to an extent. If there is such a station/department that is so slow they are running one call a day, they clearly can and should be used for other purposes, i.e. EMS. While there may also be some rich cities providing their FDs with tempurpedic beds and big screen TVs, lets not make the assumption its that way with every department. My guys are sleeping on beds that are 45 years old. They have a nice TV, but they pooled together and paid for it out of their own pockets.

Volunteers are not the answer, except for the most rural departments. Weve had three volunteer fire departments in my area close up shop recently and coverage has been handed off to the nearest paid department (mine). People just dont want to volunteer anymore in a lot of areas. Plus, put one paid officer in a station supplemented by volunteers and see what happens when they have a fire and no one shows up. My council was actually pushing for me to add volunteers and get rid of paid staff until they saw that happen at a neighboring department. They havent mentioned it since.





Email Alerts

Powered by Google