Questions Surround Washington D.C. Man's Death

Posted: Thursday, December 4, 2008
Updated: December 4th, 2008 09:17 PM EDT
Enlarge Article Text Reduce Article Text Print Article Email this Article to a Friend

Questions Surround Washington D.C. Man's Death






Open Airways
Open Airways: Stories from the back of the ambulance
EMS responders share some of the most meaningful cases of their careers, sometimes with humor and always with compassion. We hope that they will help us improve your practice and inspire a new generation of caregivers.


More on EMSResponder.com
An inside look into the upcoming issue of EMS Magazine and interview with featured writer.

Discuss today's top stories, the latest trends and techniques and more, including ALS & BLS topics.

From clinical care to EMS Life, the top emergency medical service education & feature content.

Story by WJLA-TV

Washington - Authorities are currently investigating whether a District man's sudden death could have been averted if Emergency Medical Services personnel had not misdiagnosed his condition as mere acid reflux.

According to Lolitha Givens, mother of 39-year-old Ed Givens, he was a healthy father of two teenaged boys with no history of heart trouble or breathing problems. His general good health was one reason why his complaints of chest pain and shortness of breath Tuesday night concerned her.

Givens called an ambulance, and EMS personnel examined Givens. After hearing his symptoms, they diagnosed him with acid reflux and suggested an antacid, according to Ed's brother.

Mere hours later, Givens was dead.

"To wake up and find him dead on the floor is breathtaking, just breathtaking," said Lolitha Givens. "The thing that gets me is the ambulance refused to take him. They convinced us he was OK."

As extended family members arrived at the Givens home to comfort one another, they expressed outrage that Ed Givens was not taken to the hospital, even as a precaution.

"They came, they looked at him, they left him and six hours later he's dead," said Sabrina Givens, Ed's cousin.

"I feel they could have done better," said Anthony Givens, Ed's brother. "They should have took him at his word and took him to the hospital to make sure everything was OK."

The cause of death in the case will be determined by the medical examiner after an autopsy, and an investigation is now underway to review whether proper procedures were followed.

Republished with permission from WJLA-TV


E-mail This Story Print This Story



Share your thoughts, advice, opinions, and expertise @ EMSResponder.com

     
Comments

Posted by Crusty in Somewhere In, Texas
(12/08/08 - 10:47 AM)
Whose Fault is This Guys Death
Why didnt the family take him to the hospital? Isnt it THEIR fault that he died six hours later? They refused to take him to the hospital, also. I doubt the ambulance crew refused to take him to the hospital, anyway. They probably just explained that they didnt detect any problems, they said they would be glad to take him if he wanted to go, but it was up to him. Its never the "fault" of the medics if they fail to diagnose something and save someone. Its nice when you CAN save someone, but its not the medics fault if they dont save someone.

<a href="http://www.crustyambulancedriver.blogspot.com">--Crusty Ambulance Driver</a>



Posted by Kevin in Somewhere in pa
(12/08/08 - 07:40 PM)
I have to agree w/ the previous comment.I mean if he didnt show an abnormal rythym or key signs and the ems crew lets the family know this.The emss only obligation is to suggest transport at that time it is up to the patient to consider future treatment.



Posted by Med Control in SC
(12/08/08 - 10:47 PM)
fault
Why didnt the family take him to the hospital???? Perhaps they didnt have a vehicle? OR Perhaps they believed the EMS crew when they said he would be alright, he just has some "acid reflux". I disagree with Crusty and Kevin. If the crew did not inform the patient of the possible risk refusing and did not provide the patient information to enhance their understand of their medical condition. The EMS crew is at fault. Too many EMS crews respond to 911 calls believing they have the ability to diagnose medical conditions. Ive seen this time and again over many years.

They walk in, ask the patient "whats going on?" and then "do you what us to take you to the hospital?" This cast doubt in the patients mind.... they begin to think, these EMS people see sick people all the time... maybe Im not sick enough for the ambulance. The patient then says "I dont know... what do you think?"



Posted by Paramedic in Georgia
(12/26/08 - 11:24 AM)
Fault?
As prehospital providers, our job is to rule in the possiblity of a MI. The ED physician is responsible for providing further evaluation and studies not available to us in the field - then rule out the MI or provide an alternate diagnosis. In all the potential liability surrounding this situation, I doubt well learn much about any attempts to convince the patient to go to the hospital, informed refusal, etc. for quite some time.



Posted by corinne
(01/08/09 - 08:30 AM)
u didnt know him, he was the type to man it up and not complain. the fact that he even called 911 says alot... i knew him. plus, u dont know his family and it wasnt that easy for a relative to just hop in the beat up old car and go to the hospital, thats why we pay taxes for things like an ambulence. did it ever occur to u that things in this world arent what they seem? things are not fair and equal and if was someone else they mite have done more. it kills me to think he mite still be here if they had just done a little bit more.





Email Alerts

Powered by Google